Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Fresno County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 464
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Fresno County, California totaled $22,713,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Larry Enos | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $68,434 |
102 | Steve Fausone | Fresno, CA 93711 | $68,141 |
103 | Kelly Fausone | Fresno, CA 93711 | $68,141 |
104 | Sharon Mancebo | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $68,134 |
105 | Prag Ranch | Porterville, CA 93257 | $67,577 |
106 | A And A Farms | San Joaquin, CA 93660 | $66,305 |
107 | Riley Chaney | Fresno, CA 93711 | $64,447 |
108 | Elizabeth Anne Chaney | Fresno, CA 93711 | $64,447 |
109 | Christopher Todd Allen | Fresno, CA 93722 | $63,934 |
110 | Cheryl Allen | Fresno, CA 93722 | $63,934 |
111 | Ferguson Farming LLC | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $63,297 |
112 | Jeff And Wendy Yribarren | Kerman, CA 93630 | $62,626 |
113 | David Brinkley | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $62,588 |
114 | Brughelli Fms Inc | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $60,872 |
115 | Saddleback Ranch | Coalinga, CA 93210 | $60,035 |
116 | Eagle Loma Farms | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $59,816 |
117 | Hammonds Ranch Inc | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $58,394 |
118 | Polvadero Farms Inc | Five Points, CA 93624 | $57,102 |
119 | Carroll D Rupe & Larry Sullivan Partner R & S Farm | Cantua Creek, CA 93608 | $56,530 |
120 | Monte & Laraine Lauritzen | Fresno, CA 93706 | $56,033 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”