Total Commodity Programs in Fresno County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 5,446
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Fresno County, California totaled $1,064,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Larry Enos | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $1,706,756 |
102 | The Chip Monks Inc | Fresno, CA 93723 | $1,696,061 |
103 | San Mateo Farms | Five Points, CA 93624 | $1,694,819 |
104 | Pacheco Dairy Inc | Kerman, CA 93630 | $1,685,253 |
105 | Apple Farms | Brentwood, CA 94513 | $1,685,145 |
106 | Del-mar Farms | Patterson, CA 95363 | $1,667,633 |
107 | Marlu Farms | Five Points, CA 93624 | $1,665,471 |
108 | Mark C Mckean | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $1,658,577 |
109 | Westside Farms | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $1,649,340 |
110 | Ron And Pamela D'artenay | Coalinga, CA 93210 | $1,643,652 |
111 | S & S Ranch Inc | Mendota, CA 93640 | $1,643,642 |
112 | Five Points Ranch Inc | Five Points, CA 93624 | $1,642,233 |
113 | Errecart Farms Inc | Tranquillity, CA 93668 | $1,636,138 |
114 | Jeremy S Hughes | Clovis, CA 93619 | $1,635,395 |
115 | Mary D Garcia | Laton, CA 93242 | $1,632,601 |
116 | Double H Farms | San Joaquin, CA 93660 | $1,628,505 |
117 | Brooks Farms II | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $1,605,838 |
118 | Joel P Allen | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $1,598,103 |
119 | A E Allen Ranch | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $1,595,503 |
120 | Harguindeguy Fmy Fms | Fresno, CA 93711 | $1,592,954 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”