Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Fresno County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 169
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Fresno County, California totaled $8,108,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cantua Creek Cattle Co | Hanford, CA 93232 | $1,160,705 |
2 | Domingo Mora | Reedley, CA 93654 | $482,447 |
3 | B Jue & Son | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $394,190 |
4 | Birdwell Ranch LLC | Coalinga, CA 93210 | $381,177 |
5 | Sonia Mora | Reedley, CA 93654 | $361,568 |
6 | Aulakh Farms Inc | Kerman, CA 93630 | $314,812 |
7 | Ben & Stella Elgorriaga Jv | Madera, CA 93637 | $283,832 |
8 | Constantine Kavalos | Fresno, CA 93711 | $274,201 |
9 | Alcalde Ranch LLC | Coalinga, CA 93210 | $272,094 |
10 | Richard & Susen Hewitson Jv | Avenal, CA 93204 | $270,070 |
11 | Macy Xiong | Fresno, CA 93722 | $175,325 |
12 | Humboldt West Inc | Hollister, CA 95023 | $156,948 |
13 | Narbaitz Brothers LLC | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $154,746 |
14 | Buddy A Goodman | Coalinga, CA 93210 | $136,943 |
15 | Jose Quilo | Del Rey, CA 93616 | $121,452 |
16 | Jerry Kliewer | Reedley, CA 93654 | $115,875 |
17 | William & Doris Mouren Revocable | Coalinga, CA 93210 | $112,698 |
18 | Tria Vang | Sanger, CA 93657 | $106,359 |
19 | Kenneth Birdwell | Coalinga, CA 93210 | $104,147 |
20 | Sun Dial Coleman Ltd | Kingsburg, CA 93631 | $100,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>