Commodity Certificates in Fresno County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 150
Recipients of Commodity Certificates from farms in Fresno County, California totaled $17,762,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Commodity Certificates 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Wayne Gowens Ranch | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $273,022 |
22 | Darrell Silveira | Fresno, CA 93711 | $267,826 |
23 | Coburn Ranch | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $258,174 |
24 | A J Carvalho & Sons | Tranquillity, CA 93668 | $249,360 |
25 | Hanse Farms Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $246,190 |
26 | Cca Farms III | Five Points, CA 93624 | $237,938 |
27 | Rancho Las Margueritas | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $235,020 |
28 | Bruin Farms Inc | Fresno, CA 93711 | $216,207 |
29 | Dudley J Silveira | Fresno, CA 93711 | $192,633 |
30 | Rancho De La Esperanza | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $180,822 |
31 | Double G Farms I | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $178,026 |
32 | Linda Vista Fms III | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $176,277 |
33 | Larry Jason Enos Irrev Trust | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $170,168 |
34 | George D Mc Kean | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $159,453 |
35 | Coit Farming Co | Mendota, CA 93640 | $159,396 |
36 | Celtic Farms LLC | Helm, CA 93627 | $156,950 |
37 | Rick Blanchard | Fresno, CA 93711 | $156,821 |
38 | Charles Mc Kean | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $153,464 |
39 | Louis B Souza | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $151,214 |
40 | Wm E Schuh Farms Inc | Fresno, CA 93711 | $142,160 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”