Market Gains in Glenn County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 413
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Glenn County, California totaled $36,021,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Mukhtar Ahmad & Nazra P Ahmad | Elk Grove, CA 95758 | $159,389 |
62 | Mii Farms Inc | Willows, CA 95988 | $157,563 |
63 | Andy Fiack Family Farms | Glenn, CA 95943 | $155,687 |
64 | Thomas Leroy Southam | Butte City, CA 95920 | $153,726 |
65 | Helen Marie Southam | Butte City, CA 95920 | $153,726 |
66 | Diane Isabel Knowles | Willows, CA 95988 | $143,610 |
67 | Peter Ceccon Trust | Willows, CA 95988 | $143,033 |
68 | Southam Joint Venture | Butte City, CA 95920 | $142,470 |
69 | Michael Craig Taylor | Willows, CA 95988 | $142,282 |
70 | Philip Ivan Powell | Willows, CA 95988 | $142,168 |
71 | Arlie J Hill Trust | Willows, CA 95988 | $141,028 |
72 | Rhb Farming Partnership | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $139,323 |
73 | Cecil Investments Inc | Willows, CA 95988 | $138,958 |
74 | Mohammad Azam Khan | Gold River, CA 95670 | $136,826 |
75 | Jpc Farms Inc | Willows, CA 95988 | $136,659 |
76 | Theresa Rochelle Thurman | Willows, CA 95988 | $136,190 |
77 | Lawrence Toby Thurman | Willows, CA 95988 | $136,190 |
78 | Sue Karol Taylor | Willows, CA 95988 | $135,419 |
79 | Kennedy Ranch | Glenn, CA 95943 | $131,014 |
80 | Thomas Allen Larrabee | Willows, CA 95988 | $129,002 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”