Counter Cyclical Program in Glenn County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 871
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Glenn County, California totaled $19,697,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Steven W Neader | Colusa, CA 95932 | $55,883 |
82 | Blue Gum Ranch | Davis, CA 95616 | $55,772 |
83 | Rice Researchers Inc | Glenn, CA 95943 | $55,439 |
84 | Parisio Farms Inc | Willows, CA 95988 | $54,743 |
85 | Alice J Montz Farms | Orland, CA 95963 | $54,601 |
86 | Peter Ceccon Jr | Willows, CA 95988 | $54,515 |
87 | Judith Bernadine Ceccon | Willows, CA 95988 | $54,515 |
88 | Newland Carmon Danley Family Trus | Willows, CA 95988 | $53,477 |
89 | K C Farms Inc | Willows, CA 95988 | $53,295 |
90 | Mill Street Farms | Durham, CA 95938 | $53,034 |
91 | Thl Farms Inc | Colusa, CA 95932 | $52,739 |
92 | Thomas Allen Larrabee | Willows, CA 95988 | $52,736 |
93 | Mii Farms Inc | Willows, CA 95988 | $52,682 |
94 | A & J Zwald Joint Venture | Durham, CA 95938 | $52,556 |
95 | Frank Corriea | Chico, CA 95928 | $52,247 |
96 | John Patrick Cecil | Willows, CA 95988 | $52,056 |
97 | Mukhtar Ahmad & Nazra P Ahmad | Elk Grove, CA 95758 | $52,014 |
98 | Laverne Boudro | Artois, CA 95913 | $51,370 |
99 | Brian Dunell Hurlburt | Willows, CA 95988 | $51,105 |
100 | T K Enterprises Inc | Glenn, CA 95943 | $50,833 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”