Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Glenn County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 743
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Glenn County, California totaled $26,259,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | 2013 Richard Azevedo Revocable Trust | Auburn, CA 95604 | $54,922 |
122 | Ratliff And Demmer Farms | Artois, CA 95913 | $54,730 |
123 | Aslam & Tariq Khan Farms | Butte City, CA 95920 | $54,339 |
124 | Rush Fox Ranch | Orland, CA 95963 | $54,038 |
125 | Couto Brothers | Willows, CA 95988 | $54,014 |
126 | Andy Weinrich | Willows, CA 95988 | $52,888 |
127 | Theodore D Parisio Jr | Willows, CA 95988 | $52,808 |
128 | Moore Family Farm | Orland, CA 95963 | $52,546 |
129 | J & T Lohse Farms | Artois, CA 95913 | $52,540 |
130 | Small Hills Farms | Durham, CA 95938 | $52,323 |
131 | Wright Ranch LLC | Princeton, CA 95970 | $51,120 |
132 | Kenneth Sullivan | Orland, CA 95963 | $51,115 |
133 | Couto Dairy | Willows, CA 95988 | $50,872 |
134 | Keith David Friesen | Glenn, CA 95943 | $50,377 |
135 | Geof Miller | Orland, CA 95963 | $49,500 |
136 | 3 V Ranch | Orland, CA 95963 | $49,052 |
137 | Charles W Sanford | Durham, CA 95938 | $48,234 |
138 | A & B Janko I-5 Orchard, Inc | Carmel, CA 93923 | $48,114 |
139 | Faye Pierce-hendry | Hamilton City, CA 95951 | $48,104 |
140 | Cgd Farms | Princeton, CA 95970 | $47,753 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”