Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Humboldt County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 166
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Humboldt County, California totaled $6,391,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | John M Vevoda | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $88,496 |
22 | Frank J Leonardo | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $84,595 |
23 | Dennis Leonardi | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $83,437 |
24 | Robert J Vevoda | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $82,185 |
25 | Regli Jersey's - James P Regli | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $79,615 |
26 | Skylar J Rice | Loleta, CA 95551 | $78,417 |
27 | Jack P Russ | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $77,482 |
28 | Bess Dairy Inc | Carlotta, CA 95528 | $77,214 |
29 | Sharon Lutz | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $74,305 |
30 | Diamond R Ranch | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $74,061 |
31 | Lane Christiansen | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $71,674 |
32 | Fort Baker Ranch Co | Kneeland, CA 95549 | $69,116 |
33 | Humboldt Auction Yard LLC | Fortuna, CA 95540 | $63,556 |
34 | Fort Seward Ranch | Garberville, CA 95542 | $63,461 |
35 | Riverside Dairy | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $62,105 |
36 | Radelfinger Dairy LLC | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $56,071 |
37 | Mr Jourdan Donneley Del Biaggio | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $55,640 |
38 | Peter Bussman | Blue Lake, CA 95525 | $53,796 |
39 | Daniel Del Biaggio | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $53,517 |
40 | George Toste Jr | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $53,110 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”