Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Imperial County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 138
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Imperial County, California totaled $6,801,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Artesia Farms Inc | Holtville, CA 92250 | $34,358 |
42 | Vail Ranches | Brawley, CA 92227 | $32,601 |
43 | Mike Sudduth Farms Inc | Brawley, CA 92227 | $31,575 |
44 | Troy Caston Farms | Brawley, CA 92227 | $30,999 |
45 | Ronald C Leimgruber | Holtville, CA 92250 | $30,957 |
46 | Tim Allen Farms LLC | Brawley, CA 92227 | $29,564 |
47 | Mvg Farms Inc | Holtville, CA 92250 | $26,897 |
48 | Frank R Miranda | Holtville, CA 92250 | $26,761 |
49 | Cal Evoo LLC | Brawley, CA 92227 | $25,863 |
50 | Michael D Reeves | Brawley, CA 92227 | $24,747 |
51 | Michael D Claverie | Holtville, CA 92250 | $24,039 |
52 | West-gro Farms Inc | El Centro, CA 92244 | $23,916 |
53 | Mark Brandt Farms LLC | Brawley, CA 92227 | $23,290 |
54 | Chimits Farming Company | Holtville, CA 92250 | $23,156 |
55 | Auza Farms Inc | Brawley, CA 92227 | $22,401 |
56 | Nilson Farms Inc | Brawley, CA 92227 | $22,158 |
57 | A-z Farms Inc | Calipatria, CA 92233 | $21,493 |
58 | Pfister & Son Inc | Brawley, CA 92227 | $20,835 |
59 | Triple S Farms Inc | Brawley, CA 92227 | $20,682 |
60 | Hannon Farms Inc | Brawley, CA 92227 | $20,583 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”