Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Imperial County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 95
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Imperial County, California totaled $1,268,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Mary K Ruegger | Westmorland, CA 92281 | $5,095 |
62 | Gargiulo Farms Inc | Brawley, CA 92227 | $5,000 |
63 | Thomas P Gargiulo | Brawley, CA 92227 | $4,882 |
64 | Mvg Farms Inc | Holtville, CA 92250 | $4,791 |
65 | Tnt Management Inc | Brawley, CA 92227 | $4,648 |
66 | Kevin Grizzle Farms LLC | Holtville, CA 92250 | $4,586 |
67 | Myron Fortin | Imperial, CA 92251 | $4,574 |
68 | Douglas Westmoreland | Imperial, CA 92251 | $4,265 |
69 | John Curtis Rutherford | Brawley, CA 92227 | $4,261 |
70 | Thomas Boyd Rutherford | Brawley, CA 92227 | $3,836 |
71 | Wavra Bros Gp | Brawley, CA 92227 | $3,411 |
72 | C & G Farms Inc | Gonzales, CA 93926 | $3,144 |
73 | Fifield Land Co | Brawley, CA 92227 | $3,003 |
74 | Kc Farms LLC | Somerton, AZ 85350 | $2,759 |
75 | Jaime Silva Rocha | Indio, CA 92201 | $2,534 |
76 | Desert Sky Farms Gp | Brawley, CA 92227 | $2,197 |
77 | Melton Huffman | Calipatria, CA 92233 | $1,937 |
78 | Michael D Claverie | Holtville, CA 92250 | $1,616 |
79 | Artesia Farms Inc | Holtville, CA 92250 | $1,557 |
80 | Double M Farms Inc | Brawley, CA 92227 | $1,411 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”