Market Loss Assistance Program in Imperial County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 429
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Imperial County, California totaled $15,830,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Martin R Auza | Brawley, CA 92227 | $92,278 |
62 | River Valley Ranches Gp | Brawley, CA 92227 | $90,250 |
63 | James R Smith | Brawley, CA 92227 | $89,500 |
64 | John Robert Benson | Brawley, CA 92227 | $88,998 |
65 | Carolyn F Benson | Brawley, CA 92227 | $87,054 |
66 | Topflavor Farms Inc | Yuma, AZ 85366 | $85,961 |
67 | Ben More Farms | Brawley, CA 92227 | $84,510 |
68 | Black Dog Farms | Holtville, CA 92250 | $83,379 |
69 | Western Farms L P | Brawley, CA 92227 | $80,000 |
70 | Baja Farms | Holtville, CA 92250 | $78,324 |
71 | Eugene Dahm | Brawley, CA 92227 | $77,928 |
72 | Raul Rodriguez Sr | Westmorland, CA 92281 | $76,832 |
73 | Stephen Watte | Calipatria, CA 92233 | $75,912 |
74 | Strahm Farms Inc | Holtville, CA 92250 | $74,057 |
75 | Joseph A Auza Jr | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $73,114 |
76 | Robert Bruce Smith | Brawley, CA 92227 | $73,025 |
77 | South Valley Inc | Holtville, CA 92250 | $72,725 |
78 | J C Reeves | Brawley, CA 92227 | $71,235 |
79 | Gargiulo Farms Inc | Brawley, CA 92227 | $70,538 |
80 | Schaffner Dairy Inc | Holtville, CA 92250 | $69,563 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”