Production Flexibility Program in Imperial County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 492
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Imperial County, California totaled $30,327,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Troy Caston Farms | Calipatria, CA 92233 | $291,907 |
22 | Hannon Ranches Ltd | Brawley, CA 92227 | $288,103 |
23 | Bill Wiest Ranches Inc | Carmel, CA 93923 | $285,009 |
24 | Lawrence Cox Ranches | Brawley, CA 92227 | $282,124 |
25 | Rutherfords II | Brawley, CA 92227 | $277,976 |
26 | Stephen Reeves | Brawley, CA 92227 | $275,771 |
27 | William L Brandt | Brawley, CA 92227 | $266,947 |
28 | Ralph & Linette Taylor Revocable Trust - Ralph Tay | Brawley, CA 92227 | $261,990 |
29 | Mark Osterkamp | Brawley, CA 92227 | $257,790 |
30 | John N Osterkamp | Brawley, CA 92227 | $256,995 |
31 | E Strahm & Sons Inc | Holtville, CA 92250 | $256,226 |
32 | John V Hannon | Brawley, CA 92227 | $247,921 |
33 | My Grain Co LLC | El Centro, CA 92243 | $236,184 |
34 | Tony Abatti Farms LLC | El Centro, CA 92243 | $233,547 |
35 | Due Fratelli Inc | El Centro, CA 92243 | $232,169 |
36 | Jerry Lance Reeves | Brawley, CA 92227 | $224,706 |
37 | Jose Camacho | Brawley, CA 92227 | $223,570 |
38 | Bonanza Farms | El Centro, CA 92244 | $221,078 |
39 | Kayhof Farms | Brawley, CA 92227 | $218,994 |
40 | Marlin Medearis Ranches Inc | Brawley, CA 92227 | $218,927 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”