Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Kern County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 62
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Kern County, California totaled $1,291,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Rosemary Twisselman | Mc Kittrick, CA 93251 | $19,539 |
22 | Barbara Robinson-barbara E Robinson Trust | Caliente, CA 93518 | $19,388 |
23 | Carver Livestock LLC | Bakersfield, CA 93314 | $18,341 |
24 | Barbara Cummings | Keene, CA 93531 | $18,115 |
25 | Jack Lavers | Glennville, CA 93226 | $17,629 |
26 | Joe Esnoz | Shafter, CA 93263 | $17,403 |
27 | Steven Twisselman | Mc Kittrick, CA 93251 | $16,694 |
28 | Carl Daniel | Bakersfield, CA 93314 | $15,687 |
29 | Antelope Ranch Company | Shandon, CA 93461 | $14,281 |
30 | Betty Albitre | Woody, CA 93287 | $14,225 |
31 | Chisholm Twisselman | Mc Kittrick, CA 93251 | $12,965 |
32 | B & D Cattle Co | Tehachapi, CA 93561 | $11,410 |
33 | Monte W Rudnick | Glennville, CA 93226 | $10,873 |
34 | Andrea Albitre | Woody, CA 93287 | $8,935 |
35 | Little Creek Ranch LLC | Bakersfield, CA 93308 | $8,804 |
36 | Robert Woody Ranch LLC | Woody, CA 93287 | $8,276 |
37 | Bruce F Carver | Bakersfield, CA 93308 | $7,832 |
38 | Daniel Jaureguy | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $5,620 |
39 | Kathy L Ferguson | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $5,356 |
40 | David Ferguson | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $5,356 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”