Farm Subsidy information
Kern County, California
Total Subsidies in Kern County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 345
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kern County, California totaled $76,142,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Glory Bee Co LLC | Shafter, CA 93263 | $189,773 |
42 | , | $188,656 | |
43 | S & S Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93311 | $187,768 |
44 | , | $187,500 | |
45 | Buttonwillow Land And Cattle Co | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $179,663 |
46 | Dan S Drake | Bakersfield, CA 93302 | $174,283 |
47 | White Wolf Partners | Walnut Creek, CA 94598 | $173,768 |
48 | Michael Lloyd Grisedale | Bakersfield, CA 93308 | $169,970 |
49 | Laut Farms LLC | Bakersfield, CA 93307 | $149,160 |
50 | Alfred Palla Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93309 | $147,804 |
51 | Legacy Investments Inc | Bakersfield, CA 93302 | $147,603 |
52 | Hardeep Kaur | Bakersfield, CA 93307 | $147,077 |
53 | Grapevine Vineyards Inc | Arvin, CA 93203 | $146,745 |
54 | C & F Farm LLC | Lamont, CA 93241 | $145,258 |
55 | Centennial Livestock | Fresno, CA 93711 | $143,649 |
56 | 9l Livestock Co LLC | Bakersfield, CA 93390 | $141,257 |
57 | Mentone Citrus Growers | Los Angeles, CA 90021 | $139,811 |
58 | A & F Sheep Company Inc | Bakersfield, CA 93308 | $138,225 |
59 | Spitzer Farms Inc | Lamont, CA 93241 | $137,015 |
60 | Mandeep Singh Kooner | Bakersfield, CA 93307 | $134,784 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”