Deficiency Payment in Kern County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 742
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Kern County, California totaled $-2,388,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Diffenbaugh Farming | Lost Hills, CA 93249 | $1,906 |
82 | Tim Yaksitch | Lamont, CA 93241 | $1,894 |
83 | Peter J Belluomini | Bakersfield, CA 93312 | $1,832 |
84 | A & L Ghilarducci Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93314 | $1,829 |
85 | Si Changala | Porterville, CA 93257 | $1,791 |
86 | Lance Costa | Bakersfield, CA 93304 | $1,693 |
87 | Jerry L Borel | Bakersfield, CA 93312 | $1,678 |
88 | W A Burum & Son | Delano, CA 93215 | $1,665 |
89 | Samarin Brothers | Wasco, CA 93280 | $1,660 |
90 | Wavoc Inc | Bakersfield, CA 93309 | $1,621 |
91 | H D Norman | Bakersfield, CA 93384 | $1,573 |
92 | Bel-an Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93383 | $1,495 |
93 | Donald L Jackson | Traver, CA 93673 | $1,438 |
94 | Freitas & Sons | Bakersfield, CA 93307 | $1,385 |
95 | Javier Vidaurreta Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93309 | $1,380 |
96 | Mario Buoni & Sons | Bakersfield, CA 93311 | $1,370 |
97 | Cal Organic Farms/tri Duncan Farm | Bakersfield, CA 93390 | $1,320 |
98 | Robert Scott Cattle Co | Falls Church, VA 22040 | $1,302 |
99 | Mitchell Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93308 | $1,284 |
100 | Suzanne Goelet Broughten | Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 | $1,257 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”