Total Commodity Programs in Kern County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,583
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Kern County, California totaled $762,198,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Joe S Esnoz Farms | Lost Hills, CA 93249 | $2,021,301 |
82 | Cee Kae Farms | Visalia, CA 93291 | $2,020,327 |
83 | Willow Ridge Ranch | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $2,003,591 |
84 | Bryan Bone Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93314 | $1,968,688 |
85 | Poso Creek Family Dairy LLC | Ontario, CA 91761 | $1,921,596 |
86 | J D & K Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93309 | $1,906,148 |
87 | Keith Barnard & Sons | Bakersfield, CA 93311 | $1,897,141 |
88 | Mosley Farms | Shafter, CA 93263 | $1,893,786 |
89 | Four D Farming | Bakersfield, CA 93313 | $1,863,393 |
90 | David Daniel Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93314 | $1,853,798 |
91 | Westfarmers | Visalia, CA 93291 | $1,847,493 |
92 | Henry Vander Poel & Son Dairy | Wasco, CA 93280 | $1,844,203 |
93 | Affentranger Bros | Bakersfield, CA 93314 | $1,830,187 |
94 | Faial Farms Lp | Arvin, CA 93203 | $1,799,053 |
95 | Fabbri Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93380 | $1,786,153 |
96 | G 3 Dairy | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $1,757,252 |
97 | Ohanneson Enterprises | Shafter, CA 93263 | $1,749,831 |
98 | Aukeman Dairy | Shafter, CA 93263 | $1,736,817 |
99 | Mcmoo Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93314 | $1,733,855 |
100 | Bloemhof Farms & Harvesting | Shafter, CA 93263 | $1,710,823 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”