Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Kern County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 236
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Kern County, California totaled $23,578,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Ronnie Burgess | Bakersfield, CA 93380 | $49,284 |
102 | Garcia Family Farms Inc | Arvin, CA 93203 | $48,892 |
103 | Beechinor Cattle Feeding Co Inc | Bakersfield, CA 93308 | $48,613 |
104 | Fred Beard | Glennville, CA 93226 | $46,963 |
105 | Chisholm Twisselman | Mc Kittrick, CA 93251 | $45,422 |
106 | Daniel Jaureguy | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $45,259 |
107 | Bruce F Carver | Bakersfield, CA 93308 | $43,823 |
108 | Eric Stewart | Mc Kittrick, CA 93251 | $39,642 |
109 | Robert Sutton | Los Angeles, CA 90049 | $39,623 |
110 | , | $38,786 | |
111 | Sandra Mccutcheon | Caliente, CA 93518 | $38,481 |
112 | Dale M Cummings | Keene, CA 93531 | $37,534 |
113 | Tamara Barkley | Lake Isabella, CA 93240 | $36,206 |
114 | Kathy L Ferguson | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $36,075 |
115 | David Ferguson | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $36,075 |
116 | George Marantos | Tehachapi, CA 93581 | $33,818 |
117 | Famoso Cattle Co Inc | Chiloquin, OR 97624 | $32,507 |
118 | Robert Schultz | Tehachapi, CA 93561 | $32,477 |
119 | Diane Rudnick | Bakersfield, CA 93313 | $29,924 |
120 | Gerald F Knopf | Bakersfield, CA 93380 | $28,964 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”