Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Kern County, California, 2021

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 325

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Kern County, California totaled $18,705,000 in in 2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
2021
121Pond Ranch IncBakersfield, CA 93312$27,630
122Pete & Teresa Romanini FarmsBakersfield, CA 93311$26,997
123Tulanni FarmsButtonwillow, CA 93206$26,738
124Miguel Vargas Gonzalez JrArvin, CA 93203$24,480
125Karamjit K TiwanaBakersfield, CA 93301$24,245
126Carol BerkeNewport Beach, CA 92660$24,157
127J Dolores Parra JrArvin, CA 93203$24,016
128Etchamendy Sheep Co IncBakersfield, CA 93314$23,795
129Canyon RanchExeter, CA 93221$23,565
130Palla Rosa Bv Dairy IncBakersfield, CA 93313$23,334
131Jeff Banducci Farms IncBakersfield, CA 93314$23,330
132Tomas O ZepedaAvenal, CA 93204$22,976
133Ajitpal S TiwanaBakersfield, CA 93301$22,305
134Wayne W Arnold - Wayne Arnold Farms LLCShafter, CA 93263$22,262
135Affentranger RanchesBakersfield, CA 93314$22,054
136Melvin Rub & Marjorie Rub Family TrustShafter, CA 93263$21,916
137Mandeep Singh KoonerBakersfield, CA 93307$21,635
138A & A FarmsBakersfield, CA 93307$21,378
139Lekkerkerker FarmsBakersfield, CA 93314$21,352
140Donald BattuSanta Monica, CA 90405$21,079

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag