Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Kern County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 19 of 19
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Kern County, California totaled $1,788,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Starrh Family Farms Lp | Shafter, CA 93263 | $242,500 |
2 | Faial Farms Lp | Arvin, CA 93203 | $223,122 |
3 | Kern Ridge Growers LLC | Arvin, CA 93203 | $193,750 |
4 | Western Sky Dairy LLC | Bakersfield, CA 93311 | $177,500 |
5 | Thomson International Inc | Bakersfield, CA 93307 | $143,300 |
6 | Vignolo Farms Inc | Shafter, CA 93263 | $125,050 |
7 | Landmark Fruit Company LLC | Bakersfield, CA 93309 | $121,592 |
8 | Giumarra Vineyards Corp | Bakersfield, CA 93303 | $116,597 |
9 | Eaton Pistachios LLC | Sea Ranch Lakes, FL 33308 | $99,081 |
10 | Stiefvater Family Trust 2007 | Chico, CA 95926 | $67,500 |
11 | Golden Gem Farms LLC | Bakersfield, CA 93307 | $62,500 |
12 | Val-mar Farms LLC | Bakersfield, CA 93307 | $56,681 |
13 | Stiefvater Orchards Lp | Chico, CA 95926 | $50,216 |
14 | Dosanjh Bros LLC | Bakersfield, CA 93307 | $50,000 |
15 | Amalia's Ranch | Arvin, CA 93203 | $28,865 |
16 | , | $12,625 | |
17 | , | $9,607 | |
18 | Grapery Inc | Shafter, CA 93263 | $5,000 |
19 | Amalia P Garcia | Arvin, CA 93203 | $2,090 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”