Farm Subsidy information
Kern County, California
Total Subsidies in Kern County, California, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 364
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kern County, California totaled $64,856,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Tjaarda Dairy | Shafter, CA 93263 | $227,760 |
22 | Poso Creek Family Dairy LLC | Ontario, CA 91761 | $209,630 |
23 | Newhouse Dairy | Bakersfield, CA 93313 | $203,783 |
24 | Julian Pierucci & Son | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $197,968 |
25 | Kirschenmann Bros | Shafter, CA 93263 | $197,431 |
26 | Crettol Farms | Wasco, CA 93280 | $194,853 |
27 | Vanden Berge Dairy | Bakersfield, CA 93311 | $191,838 |
28 | Toretta Farms | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $191,347 |
29 | Skyview Dairy | Bakersfield, CA 93314 | $187,433 |
30 | Mcmoo Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93314 | $186,022 |
31 | Bear Mountain Dairy | Bakersfield, CA 93313 | $182,673 |
32 | Trilogy Dairy Lp | Bakersfield, CA 93311 | $178,564 |
33 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $173,697 |
34 | Chicca Bros/twin Farms | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $172,666 |
35 | Sammy Ghilarducci | Bakersfield, CA 93314 | $171,764 |
36 | T & W Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93311 | $168,705 |
37 | Etchegaray Farms LLC | Visalia, CA 93279 | $166,786 |
38 | Torigiani Farms | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $166,067 |
39 | Melvin M Mcconnell Farms Lp | Wasco, CA 93280 | $163,559 |
40 | Harry & Jacob Samarin Lp | Bakersfield, CA 93314 | $160,512 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”