Total Disaster Programs in Kings County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 104
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Kings County, California totaled $13,298,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ernest A Taylor | Hanford, CA 93232 | $157,575 |
22 | , | $154,199 | |
23 | Roller Land Co Inc | Stratford, CA 93266 | $145,261 |
24 | Mark Shannon | Huntington Beach, CA 92648 | $141,080 |
25 | Hansen Gardner & Hansen | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $135,296 |
26 | B & L Farms | Hanford, CA 93230 | $134,765 |
27 | Vista Verde Farms Tic | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $134,106 |
28 | Egc Investments Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $130,829 |
29 | Craig P Shannon | San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 | $128,898 |
30 | Richard Kochergen | Fresno, CA 93794 | $125,000 |
31 | Landbouw Ranches LLC | Hanford, CA 93230 | $125,000 |
32 | Isabella Vera Freitas 2013 Irrevocable Trust | Hanford, CA 93230 | $121,580 |
33 | Larry A Bettencourt | Hanford, CA 93230 | $117,894 |
34 | Mpb Ranches LLC | Kingsburg, CA 93631 | $117,020 |
35 | David Te Velde | Hanford, CA 93230 | $116,907 |
36 | Alice Te Velde | Hanford, CA 93230 | $116,907 |
37 | B & L Farms II | Hanford, CA 93230 | $113,518 |
38 | Judi Kay Freitas Dba New Dawn Farms | Hanford, CA 93232 | $109,766 |
39 | B & B Walker Farms Inc | Armona, CA 93202 | $102,686 |
40 | Freitas Farms I | Hanford, CA 93232 | $101,385 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”