Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Kings County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 490
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Kings County, California totaled $7,467,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Wolfsen Ranch | Stratford, CA 93266 | $37,333 |
42 | Sunny Brooks Farms | Hanford, CA 93230 | $37,121 |
43 | South Fork Ranch Inc | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $37,120 |
44 | Roller Land Co Inc | Stratford, CA 93266 | $37,120 |
45 | Island Cattle Co LLC | Visalia, CA 93290 | $37,120 |
46 | Great Harvest Farms LLC | Fresno, CA 93711 | $37,120 |
47 | Grimmius Cattle Company Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $37,094 |
48 | Tos Farms Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $37,080 |
49 | Brandon Silveira | Hanford, CA 93230 | $37,079 |
50 | Don Headrick J V | Hanford, CA 93230 | $36,923 |
51 | Esajian Farming Co | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $36,843 |
52 | Double L Cattle Co | Visalia, CA 93290 | $36,421 |
53 | Mary Welch Farms Inc | Fresno, CA 93745 | $36,233 |
54 | Wilson Ranch | Stratford, CA 93266 | $35,867 |
55 | Valley View Farms | Hanford, CA 93230 | $35,312 |
56 | Valadao Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $35,214 |
57 | J2o Farms LLC | Hanford, CA 93230 | $34,782 |
58 | Armstead Ranch | Stratford, CA 93266 | $34,382 |
59 | John C Rexroth | Bakersfield, CA 93308 | $34,206 |
60 | Mary Rexroth | Bakersfield, CA 93308 | $34,206 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”