Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Kings County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 169
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Kings County, California totaled $2,418,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Eliseu Cunha Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $19,736 |
42 | J C J Dairy Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $19,511 |
43 | Di-man G Farms | Hanford, CA 93230 | $19,502 |
44 | Mattos Family Limited Partnership | Hanford, CA 93230 | $19,398 |
45 | Atsma-cameron Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $18,901 |
46 | Hollands Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $18,496 |
47 | 4 C's Dairies | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $18,495 |
48 | Caetano Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $18,382 |
49 | V L Furtado Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $18,158 |
50 | Eden Vale Dairy | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $18,044 |
51 | Murphy Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $17,480 |
52 | Tony A Mattos Jr Kansas Holstein | Hanford, CA 93230 | $17,337 |
53 | Lone Star Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $17,142 |
54 | River Ranch Farms LLC | Hanford, CA 93230 | $17,029 |
55 | Bernard Te Velde Dairy | Visalia, CA 93291 | $16,804 |
56 | Lima And Son Dairy | Selma, CA 93662 | $16,804 |
57 | Angelo Martins Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $16,691 |
58 | Val And Maria Pires Rev 2007 Trus | Hanford, CA 93230 | $16,535 |
59 | Medeiros Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $16,466 |
60 | Tony Thomas | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $16,070 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”