Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Kings County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 169
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Kings County, California totaled $2,418,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Nancy Thomas | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $16,070 |
62 | Droogh Dairy Lp | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $16,015 |
63 | C & C Holsteins | Hanford, CA 93230 | $15,831 |
64 | Netto Ag Inc Double N Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $15,450 |
65 | Fsm Dairy | Visalia, CA 93277 | $15,337 |
66 | Barreto And Silveira | Hanford, CA 93230 | $15,224 |
67 | Lansing LLC | Hanford, CA 93230 | $15,173 |
68 | Antonio & Maria Garcia J V | Hanford, CA 93230 | $14,997 |
69 | Leonardo V Freitas Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $14,746 |
70 | Dias & Dias | Clements, CA 95227 | $14,548 |
71 | Lu-ar Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $13,986 |
72 | Joe Brasil Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $13,984 |
73 | Cowlifornia Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $13,984 |
74 | Log Haven Dairy | Hanford, CA 93232 | $13,958 |
75 | Galhandro Dairy | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $13,872 |
76 | Manuel M Dutra Jr Dba | Hanford, CA 93230 | $13,533 |
77 | Hamilton Santos | Hanford, CA 93230 | $13,308 |
78 | Manuel & Shirley Maciel Jv | Hanford, CA 93230 | $13,181 |
79 | John De Jong Dairy Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $13,081 |
80 | Paulo Holsteins | Hanford, CA 93230 | $12,632 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”