Farm Subsidy information
Kings County, California
Total Subsidies in Kings County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 148
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kings County, California totaled $33,753,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Don & Steve Bettencourt Fms LLC | Hanford, CA 93230 | $134,889 |
62 | Frank X Borba | Porterville, CA 93257 | $134,621 |
63 | Bar E Dairy | Kingsburg, CA 93631 | $134,002 |
64 | Dutra & Dutra Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $133,487 |
65 | J D Mello Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $132,965 |
66 | Juan Cabrera | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $131,874 |
67 | Silva & Son Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $131,596 |
68 | Jersey Creek Dairy Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $131,020 |
69 | Tri Palm Dairy | Visalia, CA 93277 | $130,649 |
70 | Golden Star Dairy LLC | Caruthers, CA 93609 | $130,280 |
71 | Vitor Borba Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $129,830 |
72 | Warmerdam Orchards Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $129,756 |
73 | David Bakker | Visalia, CA 93291 | $129,720 |
74 | , | $129,674 | |
75 | J And A Dairy LLC | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $128,673 |
76 | Mello-d Jerseys | Hanford, CA 93230 | $128,438 |
77 | Mark & Jordan Tos Living Trust | Hanford, CA 93230 | $127,002 |
78 | Georgeson Dairy | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $125,567 |
79 | Cindy Martin Kelly Martin-kelly Farms | Hanford, CA 93230 | $125,000 |
80 | Donald L Jackson | Kingsburg, CA 93631 | $125,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”