Cotton Ginning Program in Kings County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 108
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in Kings County, California totaled $3,115,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Carmen D Bettencourt | Hanford, CA 93230 | $3,618 |
82 | Larry A Bettencourt | Hanford, CA 93230 | $3,618 |
83 | Hansen Ranches | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $3,448 |
84 | Julie C Wilson Separate Property | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $3,168 |
85 | John G Avila | Laton, CA 93242 | $2,985 |
86 | Triple R Farms | Stratford, CA 93266 | $2,308 |
87 | John S Bettencourt Revocable Livi | Hanford, CA 93230 | $2,250 |
88 | Machado Family Rev Trust | Hanford, CA 93230 | $2,223 |
89 | C & B Farms | Hanford, CA 93230 | $1,758 |
90 | Jessie M Williamson Trust | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $1,529 |
91 | Robert C Stewart Rev Trust | Hanford, CA 93230 | $1,321 |
92 | Willis H Newton Jr | Oceanside, CA 92057 | $1,254 |
93 | Margaret J Newton | Stratford, CA 93266 | $983 |
94 | La Verne M Lima | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $867 |
95 | A E Nunes | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $867 |
96 | Gerald J And Justine L Theadore Rev Family Trust | Hanford, CA 93230 | $825 |
97 | Steven Dufur | Stratford, CA 93266 | $651 |
98 | James & Gloria Porter Trust | Armona, CA 93202 | $637 |
99 | Robert L Newton | Blaine, WA 98230 | $599 |
100 | James Nelson | Oak Lawn, IL 60453 | $598 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”