Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Kings County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 270
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Kings County, California totaled $5,726,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Hansen/bickner Farms | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $6,749 |
122 | Joaquim & Ana Mattos Rev 2006 Trust Dtd July 14 20 | Hanford, CA 93230 | $6,735 |
123 | Ryan Dias | Reedley, CA 93654 | $6,733 |
124 | Gonsalves M & M Farms | Hanford, CA 93230 | $6,629 |
125 | Richard P Simas | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $6,591 |
126 | Peter & Tina Rietkerk J V | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $6,534 |
127 | Peter R Sanchez | Hanford, CA 93230 | $6,360 |
128 | Kelly Deftereos | Hanford, CA 93230 | $6,252 |
129 | Bar E Dairy | Kingsburg, CA 93631 | $6,226 |
130 | Valadao Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $6,219 |
131 | Rodger Menezes | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $6,177 |
132 | Larry Davis | Hanford, CA 93230 | $6,105 |
133 | Sunset Ranch | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $5,989 |
134 | Eric Shuklian | Hanford, CA 93230 | $5,970 |
135 | B & L Farms | Hanford, CA 93230 | $5,912 |
136 | David & Kevin Brazil Farms | Hanford, CA 93230 | $5,852 |
137 | Janice I Madruga Survivor's Trust Of Nov 4, 2012 | Hanford, CA 93230 | $5,808 |
138 | Barry Mccutchen | Hanford, CA 93230 | $5,802 |
139 | Amber De Groot | Hanford, CA 93230 | $5,794 |
140 | C M Costa Testamentary Trust | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $5,782 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”