Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Kings County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 490
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Kings County, California totaled $7,467,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Medeiros & Son Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $16,331 |
142 | Bernard Te Velde Dairy | Visalia, CA 93291 | $16,249 |
143 | Grabow Farming | Hanford, CA 93230 | $15,004 |
144 | Greg Stanton Jr | Newport, OR 97365 | $14,890 |
145 | John Teixeira Farms Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $14,882 |
146 | Avila Acres Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $14,845 |
147 | John W Oliveira | Hanford, CA 93230 | $14,633 |
148 | Dairy Avenue LLC | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $14,512 |
149 | Bo Champlin Farms | Visalia, CA 93277 | $14,312 |
150 | Kcd Ranch | Stratford, CA 93266 | $14,106 |
151 | Ryan Donaghy Grandchildren's Trus | Fresno, CA 93745 | $13,815 |
152 | Freitas Triple J Irrevocable Trus | Hanford, CA 93232 | $13,776 |
153 | Danny E Rodrigues Jr | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $13,643 |
154 | Kami Lynn Rodrigues | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $13,643 |
155 | Richard P Simas | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $13,633 |
156 | Jerry F Luis | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $13,606 |
157 | B Jue & Son | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $13,571 |
158 | Champlin Farms Joint Venture | Hanford, CA 93230 | $13,447 |
159 | Coyula Farms | Helm, CA 93627 | $13,325 |
160 | Darla Harrel | Fresno, CA 93711 | $13,316 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”