Dairy Programs in Kings County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 341
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Kings County, California totaled $61,747,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Netto Ag Inc Double N Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $785,981 |
2 | Harold Dragt & Sons Dairies LLC | Hanford, CA 93230 | $733,587 |
3 | Felicita Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $651,512 |
4 | Hollandia Farms Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $639,936 |
5 | Mendes & Toste Dairy | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $633,735 |
6 | Cloverdale Dairy LLC | Hanford, CA 93230 | $621,809 |
7 | Sozinho Dairy Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $589,087 |
8 | River Ranch Farms LLC | Hanford, CA 93230 | $586,204 |
9 | Four Star Dairy Lp | Tulare, CA 93274 | $584,500 |
10 | Mattos Bros L P | Hanford, CA 93230 | $580,121 |
11 | Hollands Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $571,787 |
12 | Alvaro F Machado | Hanford, CA 93230 | $568,750 |
13 | Henry Veenendaal Limited Partners | Hanford, CA 93230 | $566,971 |
14 | South Dairy Lp | Hanford, CA 93230 | $563,736 |
15 | Joe V Pimentel | Hanford, CA 93230 | $563,020 |
16 | Dutra & Dutra Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $562,096 |
17 | M F Rosa Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $561,050 |
18 | North Dairy Lp | Hanford, CA 93230 | $556,098 |
19 | Lansing LLC | Hanford, CA 93230 | $554,007 |
20 | Tony Cox And Family Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $545,961 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>