Farm Subsidy information
Kings County, California
Total Subsidies in Kings County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 429
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kings County, California totaled $38,252,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Sozinho Jerseys | Hanford, CA 93230 | $140,139 |
42 | Jaques & Son Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $138,068 |
43 | Westside Ranch | Hanford, CA 93232 | $137,762 |
44 | Contente And Company | Hanford, CA 93230 | $137,451 |
45 | Judi Kay Freitas Dba New Dawn Farms | Hanford, CA 93232 | $135,853 |
46 | Henry Veenendaal Limited Partners | Hanford, CA 93230 | $135,846 |
47 | Sandridge Partners Lp | Los Altos, CA 94022 | $135,693 |
48 | Bar E Dairy | Kingsburg, CA 93631 | $134,331 |
49 | Felicita Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $134,298 |
50 | Carl Sousa White River Dairy | Stratford, CA 93266 | $134,271 |
51 | Jersey Creek Dairy Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $134,131 |
52 | J D Mello Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $131,876 |
53 | Ryan Dias | Reedley, CA 93654 | $131,221 |
54 | Alvaro F Machado | Hanford, CA 93230 | $129,885 |
55 | J And A Dairy LLC | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $128,448 |
56 | P & E Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $127,692 |
57 | Willow Grove Farms | Hanford, CA 93230 | $127,505 |
58 | Tri Palm Dairy | Visalia, CA 93277 | $127,356 |
59 | Joaquim & Ana Mattos Rev 2006 Trust Dtd July 14 20 | Hanford, CA 93230 | $127,242 |
60 | River Ranch Farms LLC | Hanford, CA 93230 | $127,173 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”