Farm Subsidy information
Kings County, California
Total Subsidies in Kings County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 716
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kings County, California totaled $134,929,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mattos Bros L P | Hanford, CA 93230 | $1,633,298 |
2 | Zonneveld Farms | Laton, CA 93242 | $1,530,043 |
3 | Philip Verwey Farms | Hanford, CA 93230 | $1,438,804 |
4 | Circle H Dairy LLC | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $1,402,628 |
5 | Valadao Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $1,394,118 |
6 | Rocking Horse Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $1,339,587 |
7 | Four Star Dairy Lp | Tulare, CA 93274 | $1,324,659 |
8 | Sff II | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $1,308,703 |
9 | Gilkey Five | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $1,179,364 |
10 | Cloverdale Farms | Hanford, CA 93230 | $1,152,307 |
11 | Sozinho Dairy Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $1,135,146 |
12 | Droogh Dairy Lp | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $1,124,875 |
13 | Lakeside Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $1,116,231 |
14 | Jaques & Son Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $1,099,733 |
15 | Joe Parreira Dairy | Stratford, CA 93266 | $1,098,630 |
16 | Bernard & Rebecca D Te Velde J V | Hanford, CA 93230 | $1,066,260 |
17 | Lu-ar Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $1,062,294 |
18 | Diamond D LLC | Hanford, CA 93230 | $1,061,080 |
19 | Double L Cattle Co | Visalia, CA 93290 | $1,034,318 |
20 | Grimmius Cattle Company Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $1,028,615 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>