Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Lake County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 62
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Lake County, California totaled $372,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert D Suenram | Kelseyville, CA 95451 | $4,343 |
22 | Ralph Gambonini | Witter Springs, CA 95493 | $4,294 |
23 | Rosalee Littrell | Hidden Valley Lake, CA 95467 | $4,130 |
24 | Bert Isley | Witter Springs, CA 95493 | $3,728 |
25 | Tim Strong | Upper Lake, CA 95485 | $3,458 |
26 | Michael Salmina | Lower Lake, CA 95457 | $3,441 |
27 | David E Fallstead | Lower Lake, CA 95457 | $3,128 |
28 | Drew L Mcdowell | Middletown, CA 95461 | $3,051 |
29 | Kayla E. Delbar | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $2,927 |
30 | Aaron R Hiatt | Lakeport, CA 95453 | $2,297 |
31 | Cynthia L Dutcher | Lakeport, CA 95453 | $1,952 |
32 | Larry Menzio | Middletown, CA 95461 | $1,897 |
33 | Christopher J Mclaury | Lower Lake, CA 95457 | $1,658 |
34 | Wendie Mcrae | Lower Lake, CA 95457 | $1,504 |
35 | Alfred Cook | Oakland, CA 94602 | $1,477 |
36 | Rick Collins | Calistoga, CA 94515 | $1,431 |
37 | Michael Stuart Barrish | Clearlake Oaks, CA 95423 | $1,089 |
38 | Karen Gekas | Lower Lake, CA 95457 | $1,060 |
39 | Tim Holley | Lower Lake, CA 95457 | $765 |
40 | Michelle Reid | Clearlake Oaks, CA 95423 | $709 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”