Farm Subsidy information
Lake County, California
Total Subsidies in Lake County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 61
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lake County, California totaled $5,429,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Aaron R Hiatt | Lakeport, CA 95453 | $1,814 |
42 | Rafael V Valadez | Upper Lake, CA 95485 | $1,552 |
43 | Joy D Valadez | Upper Lake, CA 95485 | $1,550 |
44 | Jacquelyn Rodrigues | Kelseyville, CA 95451 | $1,506 |
45 | Michael Salmina | Lower Lake, CA 95457 | $1,371 |
46 | Steven Garner | Clearlake Oaks, CA 95423 | $1,098 |
47 | Bert Isley | Witter Springs, CA 95493 | $1,083 |
48 | Colleen Rentsch | Lakeport, CA 95453 | $951 |
49 | Teresa L Harborth | Lower Lake, CA 95457 | $860 |
50 | Robert D Suenram | Kelseyville, CA 95451 | $724 |
51 | Gerald Beeson | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $623 |
52 | Kayla E. Delbar | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $488 |
53 | , | $353 | |
54 | Michael Stuart Barrish | Clearlake Oaks, CA 95423 | $182 |
55 | Amber M Young | Upper Lake, CA 95485 | $181 |
56 | Tim Holley | Lower Lake, CA 95457 | $128 |
57 | Thurston Williams | Upper Lake, CA 95485 | $89 |
58 | Walter Niesen | Willits, CA 95490 | $89 |
59 | Duane M Furman | Lakeport, CA 95453 | $70 |
60 | Marjean C Evans | Middletown, CA 95461 | $64 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”