Farm Subsidy information
Lake County, California
Total Subsidies in Lake County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 454
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lake County, California totaled $37,867,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Gerald Beeson | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $87,936 |
62 | Pamela Ivicevich | Lakeport, CA 95453 | $87,418 |
63 | Sarnchoy Saechou | Sacramento, CA 95820 | $85,525 |
64 | Mount Saint Helena Vineyard | Middletown, CA 95461 | $82,803 |
65 | Great Fermentations, Inc | Colorado Springs, CO 80906 | $82,711 |
66 | Dennis P Pluth | Clearlake Oaks, CA 95423 | $80,770 |
67 | Sanam LLC | Kelseyville, CA 95451 | $80,700 |
68 | Sandra Robertson | Upper Lake, CA 95485 | $77,699 |
69 | Brooke Shannon Pacini | Lakeport, CA 95453 | $77,085 |
70 | Kayla E. Delbar | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $76,974 |
71 | , | $71,796 | |
72 | Steven Garner | Clearlake Oaks, CA 95423 | $71,439 |
73 | Marlene G Ivicevich | Lakeport, CA 95453 | $70,496 |
74 | James M Carpenter | Lakeport, CA 95453 | $68,336 |
75 | Larry Morrison | Santa Rosa, CA 95407 | $67,544 |
76 | Bert Isley | Witter Springs, CA 95493 | $67,082 |
77 | Walter Niesen | Willits, CA 95490 | $66,848 |
78 | Susan Theresa Lagrande | Kelseyville, CA 95451 | $65,733 |
79 | Larry Menzio | Middletown, CA 95461 | $64,797 |
80 | Robert C Halstead | Upper Lake, CA 95485 | $64,416 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”