Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Lassen County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 102
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Lassen County, California totaled $911,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Hagata Ranch Inc | Susanville, CA 96130 | $6,203 |
42 | Kelly A, Reuck | Madeline, CA 96119 | $5,309 |
43 | Schroeder, Inc. | Janesville, CA 96114 | $5,070 |
44 | Vestal Ranch LLC | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $4,912 |
45 | Brian Wolf | Susanville, CA 96130 | $4,780 |
46 | Azevedo Cattle Inc | Reno, NV 89508 | $4,740 |
47 | Jarvis Lee Inc | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $4,637 |
48 | Daniel W Tankersley | Nubieber, CA 96068 | $4,627 |
49 | John Matley & Son | Doyle, CA 96109 | $4,228 |
50 | Flying B Ranch | Susanville, CA 96130 | $3,937 |
51 | Mark Higgins | Adin, CA 96006 | $3,731 |
52 | Jeff Askew | Ravendale, CA 96123 | $3,322 |
53 | Hulsman Ranch Partnership | Susanville, CA 96130 | $3,114 |
54 | Thomas Hammond | Herlong, CA 96113 | $3,100 |
55 | Scott Lanny Humphrey | Milford, CA 96121 | $3,047 |
56 | David J Chaidez | Bieber, CA 96009 | $2,739 |
57 | Samuel L Manes | Bieber, CA 96009 | $2,731 |
58 | Jeffrey Mccargar | Reno, NV 89506 | $2,695 |
59 | Nick Retterath | Janesville, CA 96114 | $2,686 |
60 | Andrew G Oilar | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $2,638 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”