Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Lassen County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 117
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Lassen County, California totaled $2,993,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lynette Myers | Adin, CA 96006 | $22,003 |
42 | Novy Ranches | Grenada, CA 96038 | $21,623 |
43 | John C Barnum | Herlong, CA 96113 | $21,166 |
44 | Gerig Land & Livestock LLC | Bieber, CA 96009 | $20,656 |
45 | Jack Hanson | Susanville, CA 96130 | $19,228 |
46 | Scott Lanny Humphrey | Milford, CA 96121 | $18,340 |
47 | Hulsman Ranch Partnership | Susanville, CA 96130 | $18,218 |
48 | Hat Creek Grown LLC | Hat Creek, CA 96040 | $15,745 |
49 | Parady Ranch | Standish, CA 96128 | $15,742 |
50 | Daniel W Tankersley | Nubieber, CA 96068 | $15,527 |
51 | Robert Thomas Pyle | Milford, CA 96121 | $15,173 |
52 | Mcgarva Ranch Range Division | Likely, CA 96116 | $13,949 |
53 | John Fitzgerald | Susanville, CA 96130 | $13,919 |
54 | Richard Egan | Susanville, CA 96130 | $13,780 |
55 | Schroeder, Inc. | Janesville, CA 96114 | $13,296 |
56 | Joseph J. Bertotti | Janesville, CA 96114 | $13,273 |
57 | Nor Cal Land & Cattle | San Jose, CA 95120 | $12,841 |
58 | Edward Svendsen | Tahoe City, CA 96145 | $12,363 |
59 | Frank Kimp | Bieber, CA 96009 | $11,160 |
60 | Jeff Carlon | Janesville, CA 96114 | $10,661 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”