Total Disaster Programs in Lassen County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 383
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Lassen County, California totaled $37,582,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Hulsman Ranch Partnership | Susanville, CA 96130 | $256,904 |
42 | Karin Deforest | Adin, CA 96006 | $256,708 |
43 | Joseph Bertotti | Janesville, CA 96114 | $252,599 |
44 | Lee Bailey | Janesville, CA 96114 | $249,882 |
45 | Sam Thompson | Bieber, CA 96009 | $247,751 |
46 | Lisa D. Reed | Standish, CA 96128 | $245,804 |
47 | Peter N Gerig - The Gerig Family Trust | Bieber, CA 96009 | $244,797 |
48 | Mcclelland Ranch Inc | Janesville, CA 96114 | $225,467 |
49 | Ryan Fitzpatrick | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $224,953 |
50 | Novy Ranches | Grenada, CA 96038 | $219,054 |
51 | Andrew Ospital | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $217,992 |
52 | John C Barnum | Herlong, CA 96113 | $217,104 |
53 | Richard L. Musachia | Wendel, CA 96136 | $209,765 |
54 | John Espil Sheep Co Inc | Sparks, NV 89436 | $188,744 |
55 | Kelly A, Reuck | Madeline, CA 96119 | $187,452 |
56 | Gerig Land & Livestock LLC | Bieber, CA 96009 | $186,813 |
57 | Shirley Murrer | Susanville, CA 96130 | $174,369 |
58 | Vestal Ranch LLC | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $171,424 |
59 | John Matley & Son | Doyle, CA 96109 | $168,906 |
60 | Andrew G Oilar | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $160,291 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”