Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Lassen County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 117
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Lassen County, California totaled $2,993,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | C William Johnson | Durham, CA 95938 | $46,115 |
22 | Kenneth J Wemple | Milford, CA 96121 | $44,288 |
23 | Robert P Weir | Standish, CA 96128 | $43,510 |
24 | Matandy Land & Cattle Co | Standish, CA 96128 | $41,276 |
25 | Parks Ranch Inc | Adin, CA 96006 | $39,445 |
26 | Andrew Ospital | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $39,205 |
27 | John Matley & Son | Doyle, CA 96109 | $35,989 |
28 | Peter N Gerig - The Gerig Family Trust | Bieber, CA 96009 | $34,638 |
29 | Duane Crum | Little Valley, CA 96056 | $34,023 |
30 | Thad Deforest | Adin, CA 96006 | $33,541 |
31 | Roberts Ranches LLC | Scottsdale, AZ 85260 | $32,723 |
32 | Karin Deforest | Adin, CA 96006 | $32,217 |
33 | Hagata Ranch Inc | Susanville, CA 96130 | $32,002 |
34 | Joe Egan | Janesville, CA 96114 | $31,854 |
35 | Richard L. Musachia | Wendel, CA 96136 | $30,912 |
36 | Shirley Murrer | Susanville, CA 96130 | $30,176 |
37 | Monte A Smith | Crescent Mills, CA 95934 | $30,147 |
38 | Vestal Ranch LLC | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $29,696 |
39 | Kelly A, Reuck | Madeline, CA 96119 | $24,028 |
40 | Danny C. Brown | Gerber, CA 96035 | $22,152 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”