Farm Subsidy information
Los Angeles County, California
Total Subsidies in Los Angeles County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 273
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Los Angeles County, California totaled $19,668,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Leo L Simi 1999 Trust | Lancaster, CA 93535 | $15,444 |
122 | Anthony Dominis | San Pedro, CA 90732 | $15,444 |
123 | Abundrant Fisheries LLC | Shoreline, WA 98177 | $15,414 |
124 | Max K Richie | North Fork, CA 93643 | $15,136 |
125 | David A Lundgrin | Redlands, CA 92373 | $14,947 |
126 | Benedetto Logrande | San Pedro, CA 90732 | $14,942 |
127 | Eli Lichter-marck | Topanga, CA 90290 | $14,520 |
128 | Robert Mearns | Acton, CA 93510 | $14,516 |
129 | Antwan Farag | Lancaster, CA 93535 | $14,198 |
130 | Leo L Simi Jr Child's Exempt Trus | Palmdale, CA 93551 | $13,430 |
131 | Buzzed Honeys, Inc | Altadena, CA 91001 | $13,284 |
132 | Rachel Renee Lundgrin | Redlands, CA 92373 | $13,235 |
133 | Lawren A Richards | Salmon Arm, VOE1T | $12,993 |
134 | Fish Friend Sea LLC | Long Beach, CA 90808 | $12,894 |
135 | Topanga Garden Center LLC | Chatsworth, CA 91311 | $12,587 |
136 | Villa Del Sol Sweet Cherry Farms | Lancaster, CA 93536 | $12,219 |
137 | Ramon Martinez | Baldwin Park, CA 91706 | $11,975 |
138 | Steven Oh | Lawndale, CA 90260 | $11,918 |
139 | Tamas Lehmann | Lancaster, CA 93535 | $11,295 |
140 | Pacific Bounty Fish Company, LLC | Redondo Beach, CA 90278 | $10,437 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”