Farm Subsidy information
Los Angeles County, California
Total Subsidies in Los Angeles County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 273
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Los Angeles County, California totaled $19,668,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Terrence D Kenney | Leona Valley, CA 93551 | $6,155 |
162 | Dyer Honey Company | Santa Clarita, CA 91386 | $6,093 |
163 | Cl Bees Inc | Alhambra, CA 91801 | $6,076 |
164 | Hooshpack Development Inc | Los Angeles, CA 90024 | $6,013 |
165 | Organic Farm Solution I, Inc | Lake Hughes, CA 93532 | $6,009 |
166 | Patricia L Clark | Bakersfield, CA 93304 | $5,497 |
167 | Healy Farms | Lancaster, CA 93536 | $5,377 |
168 | Ananda Marga Of Los Angeles Inc | Lake Hughes, CA 93532 | $4,873 |
169 | Agri-harvest Inc | Littlerock, CA 93543 | $4,852 |
170 | , | $4,826 | |
171 | Cal Poly Pomona Foundation Inc | Pomona, CA 91768 | $4,728 |
172 | Tri - L Apiaries | Sepulveda, CA 91343 | $4,519 |
173 | John Beery | Palmdale, CA 93551 | $4,385 |
174 | John Goit | Lancaster, CA 93536 | $4,099 |
175 | Sharon M Stierley | Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 | $4,008 |
176 | John Crowe | Redondo Beach, CA 90278 | $3,979 |
177 | Kwan K Minn | Palmdale, CA 93551 | $3,973 |
178 | Giambattista Tino Perone | San Pedro, CA 90732 | $3,860 |
179 | Gustavo Renteria | North Hollywood, CA 91605 | $3,731 |
180 | Kirsten K Keller 2019 Revocable T | Palmdale, CA 93551 | $3,730 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”