Farm Subsidy information
Los Angeles County, California
Total Subsidies in Los Angeles County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 273
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Los Angeles County, California totaled $19,668,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | High Desert Dairy LLC | Lancaster, CA 93535 | $1,498,357 |
| 2 | Dick David Diana & Douglas Zylstra | La Verne, CA 91750 | $1,143,721 |
| 3 | T-y Nursery Inc | Torrance, CA 90503 | $500,000 |
| 4 | High Desert Dairy | Lancaster, CA 93535 | $464,609 |
| 5 | B & D Cattle Co | Tehachapi, CA 93561 | $459,999 |
| 6 | Barnes Family Trust | Lancaster, CA 93536 | $421,529 |
| 7 | Honey Pacifica Company | Downey, CA 90242 | $389,449 |
| 8 | San Pedro Pride, Inc. | Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 | $250,000 |
| 9 | Cal Crystal Sea, LLC | San Pedro, CA 90731 | $250,000 |
| 10 | More Carnage, LLC | Long Beach, CA 90803 | $250,000 |
| 11 | Ritter & Godde | Lancaster, CA 93584 | $235,849 |
| 12 | Michael B Williams | Acton, CA 93510 | $221,459 |
| 13 | Cape Blanco Fishing, Lp | Bellevue, WA 98007 | $216,833 |
| 14 | Jacob Molla | Lakewood, CA 90712 | $213,876 |
| 15 | Augello Enterprises, LLC | Long Beach, CA 90813 | $200,621 |
| 16 | Terry A Munz Farming | Lancaster, CA 93536 | $199,639 |
| 17 | Blum Ranch | Acton, CA 93510 | $186,106 |
| 18 | Honey Pacifica Inc | Downey, CA 90242 | $175,806 |
| 19 | Norwalk Dairy | Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 | $158,264 |
| 20 | Aroma Orchids Of Rowland Heights | Rowland Heights, CA 91748 | $156,629 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
