Total Commodity Programs in Los Angeles County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 182
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Los Angeles County, California totaled $8,457,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Carnage Fish Company, Inc | Long Beach, CA 90803 | $104,446 |
22 | New West Growers, Inc. | Compton, CA 90221 | $103,785 |
23 | Barbara H Fishing Lp | Bellevue, WA 98007 | $102,125 |
24 | Terry A Munz Farming | Lancaster, CA 93536 | $85,459 |
25 | Pinedas Nursery, Inc. | Santa Ana, CA 92704 | $79,415 |
26 | Ferrigno Boy Fishing Lp | Bellevue, WA 98007 | $66,029 |
27 | Bill's Bees, Inc | Lakewood, CA 90712 | $65,089 |
28 | St Joseph Inc. | San Pedro, CA 90732 | $61,634 |
29 | B & D Cattle Co | Tehachapi, CA 93561 | $58,741 |
30 | Honey Pacifica Company | Downey, CA 90242 | $58,391 |
31 | Leo Simi | Lancaster, CA 93535 | $58,141 |
32 | Tenerelli Orchards | Acton, CA 93510 | $57,689 |
33 | Kare Ellingbo | Lebec, CA 93243 | $55,531 |
34 | Ross Honey Company | Valyermo, CA 93563 | $53,728 |
35 | Anelo Landscape Solution Inc | Sylmar, CA 91342 | $53,030 |
36 | Ricardo R Arrivillaga Dba Ricardo | Long Beach, CA 90805 | $50,465 |
37 | Lars Bergquist | Los Angeles, CA 90013 | $49,956 |
38 | Blue Pacific Fisheries | Newport Beach, CA 92661 | $48,635 |
39 | Mi Jalisco Nursery Inc. | Lakewood, CA 90713 | $39,350 |
40 | Gilbert Vannoy | Mission Hills, CA 91346 | $33,808 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”