Dairy Programs in Madera County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 29
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Madera County, California totaled $4,901,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Costa View Farms No 2 | Madera, CA 93637 | $482,486 |
2 | Shein Ranch Dba South Point Ranch East | Madera, CA 93637 | $331,831 |
3 | Capstone Ranch Lp | Madera, CA 93637 | $319,331 |
4 | Dos Rios Ranch Dba South Point Ranch West | Madera, CA 93637 | $303,371 |
5 | , | $257,103 | |
6 | Gregory D Hooker Diamond H Dairy | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $222,988 |
7 | Tri Iest Dairy | Madera, CA 93637 | $205,777 |
8 | Philip Verwey Dairy Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $187,402 |
9 | Double D J Farms | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $174,803 |
10 | Iest Family Farms | Madera, CA 93637 | $171,726 |
11 | Milk Time Dairy | Madera, CA 93637 | $156,402 |
12 | , | $149,179 | |
13 | Silveira Dairy | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $146,191 |
14 | , | $139,797 | |
15 | Alfred Soares Dairy | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $139,549 |
16 | R & G Dairy | Madera, CA 93637 | $139,021 |
17 | Robert La Salle | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $138,117 |
18 | Triangle M Dairy Lp | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $137,084 |
19 | Vitoria Farms | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $135,164 |
20 | Aaa Jersey Dairy Gp | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $134,626 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>