Farm Subsidy information
Madera County, California
Total Subsidies in Madera County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 254
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Madera County, California totaled $36,296,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Costa View Farms No 2 | Madera, CA 93637 | $857,486 |
2 | , | $799,409 | |
3 | Rajvir Kular | Selma, CA 93662 | $683,495 |
4 | Duane Blech | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $586,875 |
5 | Nijjar Bros Farm LLC | Madera, CA 93638 | $502,983 |
6 | Dalena Farms | Madera, CA 93636 | $497,331 |
7 | Shein Ranch Dba South Point Ranch East | Madera, CA 93637 | $331,831 |
8 | , | $327,347 | |
9 | Capstone Ranch Lp | Madera, CA 93637 | $319,331 |
10 | Dos Rios Ranch Dba South Point Ranch West | Madera, CA 93637 | $303,371 |
11 | Ramandeep Kular | Fresno, CA 93725 | $272,883 |
12 | Loren Freeman | Madera, CA 93637 | $261,875 |
13 | , | $261,875 | |
14 | Sns Farms Inc | Fresno, CA 93722 | $254,186 |
15 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $250,426 |
16 | John E Lasgoity | Madera, CA 93639 | $244,352 |
17 | , | $228,625 | |
18 | Gregory D Hooker Diamond H Dairy | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $222,988 |
19 | Tri Iest Dairy | Madera, CA 93637 | $205,777 |
20 | Real American Honey Inc | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $198,440 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>