Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Madera County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 196
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Madera County, California totaled $7,436,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Madera One 100 LLC | Palm Springs, CA 92262 | $50,868 |
42 | Pancoche Creek River Ranch LLC | Fresno, CA 93711 | $49,630 |
43 | El Peco Ranch LLC | Madera, CA 93637 | $49,411 |
44 | Atb Ranch Lp | Madera, CA 93637 | $47,964 |
45 | Mu5 Farms LLC | Hillsborough, CA 94010 | $46,750 |
46 | Robert L Austin Seymour Weinberg Etal Madera Citru | Whittier, CA 90608 | $44,149 |
47 | William Koch Boyd J Magdall Et Al Ptr Madera Pista | Las Vegas, NV 89121 | $42,468 |
48 | Bon Pack Farms | Madera, CA 93637 | $39,375 |
49 | Christopher R Debenedetto Irrv Tr Christopher R De | Fresno, CA 93723 | $36,869 |
50 | Roque Properties LLC | Fresno, CA 93711 | $36,583 |
51 | Janice A Lowder 2011 Irrevocable Trust | Madera, CA 93637 | $36,497 |
52 | Biscay Vineyards | Madera, CA 93637 | $35,715 |
53 | Daniel L & Sharon L Rich Judith S Somervell Etal P | Las Vegas, NV 89121 | $33,770 |
54 | Elizabeth & John A Bowers A J Magar & C & D Lutes | Las Vegas, NV 89121 | $31,701 |
55 | M Edward Maule Gerald P Hogan & Mclloyd Barney Eta | Las Vegas, NV 89121 | $31,693 |
56 | Green Farms LLC | San Ramon, CA 94583 | $31,623 |
57 | Leon Biscay Jr | Madera, CA 93637 | $31,372 |
58 | Ahmed Alamari | Madera, CA 93637 | $31,135 |
59 | Tac Investment Group LLC | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $30,290 |
60 | Bhatti Family Farms LLC | Fresno, CA 93727 | $29,844 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”