Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Madera County, California, 2021

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 196

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Madera County, California totaled $7,436,000 in in 2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
2021
41Madera One 100 LLCPalm Springs, CA 92262$50,868
42Pancoche Creek River Ranch LLCFresno, CA 93711$49,630
43El Peco Ranch LLCMadera, CA 93637$49,411
44Atb Ranch LpMadera, CA 93637$47,964
45Mu5 Farms LLCHillsborough, CA 94010$46,750
46Robert L Austin Seymour Weinberg Etal Madera CitruWhittier, CA 90608$44,149
47William Koch Boyd J Magdall Et Al Ptr Madera PistaLas Vegas, NV 89121$42,468
48Bon Pack FarmsMadera, CA 93637$39,375
49Christopher R Debenedetto Irrv Tr Christopher R DeFresno, CA 93723$36,869
50Roque Properties LLCFresno, CA 93711$36,583
51Janice A Lowder 2011 Irrevocable TrustMadera, CA 93637$36,497
52Biscay VineyardsMadera, CA 93637$35,715
53Daniel L & Sharon L Rich Judith S Somervell Etal PLas Vegas, NV 89121$33,770
54Elizabeth & John A Bowers A J Magar & C & D LutesLas Vegas, NV 89121$31,701
55M Edward Maule Gerald P Hogan & Mclloyd Barney EtaLas Vegas, NV 89121$31,693
56Green Farms LLCSan Ramon, CA 94583$31,623
57Leon Biscay JrMadera, CA 93637$31,372
58Ahmed AlamariMadera, CA 93637$31,135
59Tac Investment Group LLCChowchilla, CA 93610$30,290
60Bhatti Family Farms LLCFresno, CA 93727$29,844

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag