Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Madera County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 231
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Madera County, California totaled $2,191,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dirk Jan Vlot Jr | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $16,517 |
42 | Valerie Jean Vlot | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $16,517 |
43 | R & A Jensen Ranch | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $16,223 |
44 | Frank Freitas & Sons | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $15,899 |
45 | Leon & Grace Urrutia | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $15,427 |
46 | Gerritt Groeneweg Testamentary Tr | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $14,801 |
47 | Ronnie & Toni Ray Dba Circle R Da | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $14,135 |
48 | Marie Iest Fikse | Madera, CA 93637 | $12,644 |
49 | Edward Fikse | Madera, CA 93637 | $12,644 |
50 | Rice-sparrowk | Clements, CA 95227 | $12,243 |
51 | Paul Janzen | Madera, CA 93637 | $12,204 |
52 | Ron & Lydia Lewis | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $11,264 |
53 | Billy Mckinney | Madera, CA 93638 | $10,939 |
54 | Sons And Hillerman | Coarsegold, CA 93614 | $10,277 |
55 | David Sequeira Jr | Merced, CA 95348 | $10,251 |
56 | Circle W Ranch | North Fork, CA 93643 | $10,230 |
57 | Bart Topping | O Neals, CA 93645 | $9,735 |
58 | Angela Pimentel | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $9,653 |
59 | Borges Dairy | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $9,639 |
60 | Circle R South | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $9,603 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”