Total Commodity Programs in Madera County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 299
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Madera County, California totaled $14,600,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | American Dairy LLC Dirk J Vlot Sole Mbr | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $120,508 |
42 | Tri Iest Dairy | Madera, CA 93637 | $120,508 |
43 | Hansen & Sons Inc | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $120,508 |
44 | Mid-valley Investment Co LLC | Fresno, CA 93711 | $120,000 |
45 | Red Top Jerseys Lp | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $114,964 |
46 | Basila Farms LLC | Madera, CA 93637 | $106,204 |
47 | Michele R Lasgoity | Madera, CA 93637 | $104,328 |
48 | G & G Andrew Farms L P | Madera, CA 93637 | $91,944 |
49 | Pegasus Orchards LLC | Santa Monica, CA 90403 | $90,000 |
50 | Sibley Orchard | Palo Alto, CA 94302 | $83,528 |
51 | Cruz Martinez Farms LLC | Madera, CA 93637 | $82,977 |
52 | Fpr Pistachio Orchard No. 1, LLC | Palo Alto, CA 94302 | $81,588 |
53 | Greenleaf Orchards | Los Angeles, CA 90064 | $75,138 |
54 | Norma Stretch | Madera, CA 93637 | $70,607 |
55 | Post Mandarin, LLC | Palo Alto, CA 94302 | $69,993 |
56 | J&y Jimenez Dairy Inc | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $68,848 |
57 | Kerman-madera Farms LLC | Palo Alto, CA 94302 | $68,636 |
58 | Vincent P Logoluso Inc | Madera, CA 93637 | $68,261 |
59 | Sullivan Farms | Snelling, CA 95369 | $67,037 |
60 | Farrior Farm Management LLC | Fresno, CA 93722 | $66,547 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”