Loan Deficiency in Madera County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 246
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Madera County, California totaled $10,943,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Stephen Elgorriaga | Madera, CA 93637 | $41,999 |
62 | Faust Family Dairy Gp | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $41,172 |
63 | Eddie Jones | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $41,122 |
64 | Hansen & Sons Inc | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $39,994 |
65 | Anthony L Machado | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $38,489 |
66 | Johnny Romeri | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $37,851 |
67 | Chapman Farms III | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $36,813 |
68 | Fred Wittwer | Merced, CA 95340 | $33,647 |
69 | Dan Maddalena | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $33,353 |
70 | Michael Mc Ree | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $31,006 |
71 | Triple S Farms | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $30,933 |
72 | Ronald S Upton | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $30,372 |
73 | Robert Nix Jr | Madera, CA 93637 | $30,232 |
74 | John E Lasgoity | Madera, CA 93639 | $29,974 |
75 | Andrew J Slenders Jr | Laton, CA 93242 | $28,675 |
76 | Pedr0 Avila Trust | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $28,403 |
77 | Connley Clayton Farms | El Nido, CA 95317 | $27,581 |
78 | Robert Iest | Madera, CA 93639 | $27,044 |
79 | Rezendes Brothers | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $26,965 |
80 | Manuel F Machado Jr | Madera, CA 93637 | $25,568 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”