Counter Cyclical Program in Madera County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 426
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Madera County, California totaled $26,860,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Pistoresi Farms | Madera, CA 93637 | $55,355 |
102 | Clyde Wheeler | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $50,362 |
103 | Oliver Espinola | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $49,361 |
104 | William J Chandler | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $48,049 |
105 | Norman L Dill | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $47,785 |
106 | Thomas Thurber | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $47,270 |
107 | Robert Iest | Madera, CA 93639 | $47,075 |
108 | Valerio Tarabini | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $46,516 |
109 | Dorris Thurber | Morro Bay, CA 93443 | $46,480 |
110 | Joe & Pauline Galleano | Madera, CA 93637 | $45,386 |
111 | Fagundes Brothers Dairy 2 | Merced, CA 95344 | $42,797 |
112 | Avila Family Administrative Trust | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $42,417 |
113 | Francisco B Fagundes | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $42,179 |
114 | Alexandra Harris Trust II | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $41,197 |
115 | Jason R Harris Trust II | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $41,197 |
116 | John E Lasgoity | Madera, CA 93639 | $41,079 |
117 | Alfred Soares Dairy | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $40,670 |
118 | Alyson Lasgoity | Madera, CA 93639 | $40,496 |
119 | Sheppard Farms Inc | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $38,094 |
120 | Carleton Properties | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $37,998 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”