Farm Subsidy information
Madera County, California
Total Subsidies in Madera County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 2,610
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Madera County, California totaled $580,178,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Douglas Mc Ree | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $395,626 |
182 | David Baker Farming | El Nido, CA 95317 | $389,759 |
183 | Clayton Guy Haynes | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $379,875 |
184 | Enia Farms LLC | Madera, CA 93637 | $375,517 |
185 | Lion Bros Farms | Selma, CA 93662 | $374,846 |
186 | Edward Walker | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $374,665 |
187 | Virgle J Anderson | Coarsegold, CA 93614 | $374,342 |
188 | F H Farming | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $368,017 |
189 | Robert Nix Jr | Madera, CA 93637 | $365,733 |
190 | Philip Oberti Ranches Lp | Madera, CA 93639 | $362,859 |
191 | Creekside Farms Lp | Madera, CA 93637 | $360,701 |
192 | Jim Areias | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $360,468 |
193 | Anthony Lee Isaak | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $357,850 |
194 | Links Ranch LLC | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $356,849 |
195 | Charles Iest | Madera, CA 93637 | $356,055 |
196 | H & H Farming | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $356,031 |
197 | Maan Farms Inc | Madera, CA 93636 | $354,572 |
198 | Haynes Precision Spreading Inc | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $354,216 |
199 | Donna Mae Shebelut | Fresno, CA 93711 | $351,871 |
200 | Harris Farms Lp | Madera, CA 93637 | $349,719 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”